What Would Freud Think of Contemporary Psychoanalytic Theories and Techniques?
Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, envisioned his field as a living, evolving discipline. He famously encouraged others to build upon his theories and techniques, believing that psychoanalysis should grow to meet new challenges (Freud, 1914/1957). But how would Freud react to some of the major developments that followed his work? Specifically, what might he think of attachment theory, object-relations theory, and Hyman Spotnitz’s modern psychoanalysis—approaches that pushed psychoanalytic boundaries in unique ways? Let’s explore Freud’s hypothetical perspective, imagining him peering over his cigar at these innovations.
Attachment Theory: A Familiar Foundation, but Missing Drives
John Bowlby’s attachment theory, which emphasizes the critical role of early caregiver-child bonds in shaping personality, would likely resonate with Freud’s focus on childhood as the crucible of the psyche (Bowlby, 1969). Freud argued that early experiences with parents lay the groundwork for later conflicts, a view echoed in attachment theory’s exploration of secure and insecure attachment styles. He’d probably nod approvingly at Bowlby’s grounding of psychoanalytic ideas in observable behaviors and evolutionary biology, appreciating the empirical bent.
However, Freud might raise a skeptical eyebrow at attachment theory’s departure from his beloved drive theory. For Freud, the interplay of libido and aggression was central to human motivation (Freud, 1920/1955). Bowlby’s focus on attachment as a primary need, rather than a derivative of instinctual drives, could strike him as reductive. He might argue that attachment theory captures part of the picture—how relationships form—but misses the deeper unconscious conflicts fueled by eros and thanatos. Still, Freud would likely see it as a valuable, if incomplete, extension of his ideas, a bridge to broader audiences.
Object-Relations Theory: A Bold Leap into the Inner World
Object-relations theory, developed by thinkers like Melanie Klein, D.W. Winnicott, and Ronald Fairbairn, would feel closer to home for Freud. This approach explores how internalized representations of others (or “objects”) shape the self, building directly on Freud’s concepts like the superego as an internalized parental figure (Klein, 1948; Winnicott, 1958). Klein’s dive into pre-oedipal fantasies and aggressive impulses would excite Freud as a daring expansion of his ideas about the unconscious. He might, however, debate her timeline, particularly her claim that the superego forms before the Oedipus complex, which he saw as pivotal (Freud, 1923/1960).
Winnicott’s notions of the “good enough mother” and transitional objects—like a child’s beloved blanket—would intrigue Freud as creative elaborations on the mother-child dynamics he deemed foundational. These ideas align with his view of the mother as a primary love object, though he’d likely nudge Winnicott to tie them more explicitly to sexual and aggressive drives (Winnicott, 1971). Fairbairn’s shift away from drives toward relationships as the core of personality might puzzle Freud, who’d argue that instincts remain the engine of psychic life (Fairbairn, 1952). Overall, Freud would cheer object-relations for deepening the exploration of internal worlds, even if he’d want to anchor it back to his foundational principles.
Spotnitz’s Modern Psychoanalysis: A Radical Reimagining
Hyman Spotnitz’s modern psychoanalysis, designed to treat narcissistic disorders and severe conditions like schizophrenia, would spark a lively debate with Freud. Spotnitz focused on narcissistic transference, where patients treat the analyst as an extension of their own mind, a concept that builds on Freud’s idea of transference but takes it in a new direction (Spotnitz, 1969). Freud would be fascinated by this twist, but he’d likely balk at Spotnitz’s de-emphasis on interpretation. For Freud, uncovering the unconscious through interpretive insight was the heart of the “talking cure” (Freud, 1915/1957).
Spotnitz’s techniques, like “joining” the patient’s resistance to avoid overwhelming fragile egos or using “object-oriented questions” (avoiding “you” to reduce stress), would seem alien to Freud’s classical approach, which relied on free association and neutrality (Spotnitz, 1985). Freud might worry that these methods dilute the analyst’s role as a decoder of hidden conflicts. He’d also be skeptical of Spotnitz’s heavy reliance on countertransference—using the analyst’s emotional reactions as a therapeutic tool—since Freud saw countertransference as a hurdle to overcome, not a resource (Freud, 1910/1957).
Yet, Freud would likely be impressed by Spotnitz’s success with conditions he considered untreatable, like schizophrenia, which he viewed as largely inaccessible to psychoanalysis (Freud, 1914/1957). Spotnitz’s expansion of the field to include such patients would align with Freud’s call for progress, even if the methods diverged sharply from his own. Freud might say it’s less psychoanalysis and more a new therapeutic art, but he’d be curious to see its impact.
Freud’s Verdict: Progress with a Side of Debate
Freud’s vision for psychoanalysis was dynamic—he wanted it to evolve, not stagnate (Freud, 1933/1964). He’d likely admire the ambition of attachment theory, object-relations theory, and Spotnitz’s modern psychoanalysis, each pushing the boundaries of his original framework. Attachment theory’s empirical grounding would appeal to his scientific side, object-relations’ depth would excite his theoretical curiosity, and Spotnitz’s bold innovations would earn respect, even if grudgingly.
Still, Freud’s ego wasn’t small. He might argue that these approaches stray too far from his core ideas—drives, repression, and the Oedipus complex—missing the full richness of the unconscious. He’d probably muse, “They’ve ventured far from my path, but the unconscious still speaks—let’s hear what it says next.” For Freud, the conversation would be far from over, and that’s exactly what he wanted for his field.
References
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Freud, S. (1910/1957). The future prospects of psycho-analytic therapy. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 11, pp. 139–151). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1910)
Freud, S. (1914/1957). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 7–66). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1914)
Freud, S. (1915/1957). The unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 159–215). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1915)
Freud, S. (1920/1955). Beyond the pleasure principle. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 1–64). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1920)
Freud, S. (1923/1960). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 1–66). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1923)
Freud, S. (1933/1964). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 22, pp. 1–182). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1933)
Klein, M. (1948). Contributions to psycho-analysis, 1921–1945. Hogarth Press.
Spotnitz, H. (1969). Modern psychoanalysis of the schizophrenic patient. Grune & Stratton.
Spotnitz, H. (1985). Psychotherapy of preoedipal conditions: Schizophrenia and severe character disorders. Jason Aronson.
Winnicott, D. W. (1958). Collected papers: Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis. Tavistock Publications.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. Tavistock Publications.
In NJ, FL, TX, or NY? Schedule a consultation with certified psychoanalyst, Amanda Lenox!